Home Learn Differential Voting Rights: Meaning,  Example, Eligibility, Benefits & Risks

Differential Voting Rights: Meaning,  Example, Eligibility, Benefits & Risks

Differential Voting Rights: Meaning,  Example, Eligibility, Benefits & Risks

Differential voting rights (DVR) have emerged as a unique mechanism in corporate governance, allowing companies to customise voting powers attached to their equity shares. DVR shares can be a valuable tool for balancing control and capital-raising needs, making them increasingly relevant in today’s financial landscape. This article will explore the differential voting rights meaning, the issuance of DVR shares, the eligibility criteria for the same and more.

What Are Differential Voting Rights?

Differential voting rights mean shares with unequal voting powers or benefits compared to regular equity shares. These rights allow companies to issue shares that limit or enhance a shareholder’s voting influence while tailoring financial incentives such as higher dividends.

What Are DVR Shares?

DVR shares, or shares with differential voting rights, are equity shares that offer customised voting power to shareholders. Companies often use DVR shares to attract investors focused on dividends and returns rather than governance control. These shares are essential in maintaining promoter influence while raising necessary funds.

Why Do Companies Issue DVR Shares?

The issue of shares with differential voting rights occurs for three primary reasons:

  1. Prevention of Hostile Takeovers: DVR shares limit the voting power of certain shareholders, ensuring that the promoters retain a controlling stake. By issuing shares with lower voting rights, companies reduce the risk of external entities gaining significant influence, thereby protecting against hostile takeovers.
  2. Attracting Passive or Retail Investors: Many investors, particularly retail or passive ones, prefer focusing on financial returns rather than participating in managerial decision-making. DVR shares are particularly attractive to such investors as they offer higher dividends or financial benefits. Additionally, DVR shares are often issued at a discount, enabling investors to purchase a larger number of shares at a lower cost, enhancing their potential dividend income without engaging in governance.
  3. Avoiding Equity Dilution: Raising additional funds often leads to equity dilution, reducing the voting power of existing shareholders, including promoters. By issuing DVR shares with limited voting rights, companies can raise capital without significantly diluting promoter control. This ensures that the founders and key stakeholders maintain strategic decision-making authority while still securing necessary investments.

An Example of DVR Share Issuance

Jain Irrigation Systems provides a notable example of DVR issuance in India. The company issued DVR shares to attract investors, focusing on financial returns rather than control. These shares offered a 10% higher dividend than ordinary shares but carried only one-tenth of the voting rights. By doing so, Jain Irrigation successfully raised capital to support its operations and expansion while ensuring the promoters retained control over the company’s strategic decisions. This demonstrated the effectiveness of DVR shares in balancing financial needs with governance objectives.

What Is the Eligibility Criteria for Issuing DVR Shares?

The Companies Act, 2013, under Section 43(a)(ii), specifies the criteria for issuing shares with differential voting rights in India:

  • The differential voting rights section​ entails that a company must demonstrate profitability for at least three consecutive years.
  • It should have no outstanding defaults in loan repayments, interest, or deposit repayments.
  • The total DVR shares issued should not exceed 26% of the post-issue paid-up equity share capital.
  • Companies must file necessary financial and compliance documents with regulatory authorities.

SEBI Regulations Surrounding Differential Voting Rights

SEBI has created clear rules to regulate the issuance of DVR shares in India. These regulations aim to balance the interests of promoters, investors, and minority shareholders. Key regulations include:

  • Superior Voting Rights (SR): Promoters and founders can issue shares with superior voting rights, capped at a voting ratio of 10:1 compared to ordinary shares. These rights allow promoters to maintain control while raising funds.
  • IPO Conversion: SR shares must convert into ordinary shares within five years of the company’s initial public offering (IPO). This ensures fairness for new shareholders post-listing.
  • Mandatory Disclosures: Companies issuing DVR shares must disclose detailed information about their structure and rights in offer documents. Transparency is key to building investor confidence.
  • Limits on Issuance: SEBI caps the issuance of DVR shares at a percentage of total share capital to prevent over-reliance on these instruments.

Benefits of Differential Voting Rights Shares India

DVR shares provide several advantages for companies, investors, and the broader market:

  • For Companies: DVR shares allow companies to raise funds while ensuring founders or promoters retain control over key decisions. This flexibility helps companies grow without surrendering authority.
  • For Investors: Investors can benefit from higher dividend payouts or discounted pricing associated with DVR shares. These features attract retail and passive investors who prioritise financial returns over voting influence.
  • For Startups: DVR shares provide a pathway for startups to secure large-scale investments without diluting their vision or control. SEBI’s framework supports this dynamic, making it easier for early-stage companies to thrive.
  • Prevention of Hostile Takeovers: By limiting voting rights, DVR shares protect companies from hostile acquisition attempts, ensuring stability in governance.

Risks of Differential Voting Rights Shares

Despite their advantages, DVR shares carry potential risks that stakeholders must understand:

  • Reduced Voting Power: Shareholders with DVR shares often have limited influence on corporate governance. This can alienate some investors who prefer to have a say in decision-making.
  • Investor Confidence: Some investors may perceive DVR shares as a tool for promoters to consolidate control unfairly. This perception can lower trust and impact market reception.
  • Complexity for Retail Investors: DVR shares come with unique financial and governance structures that may need clarification for more informed investors. This complexity can deter potential investors from participating.
  • Limited Appeal in Certain Markets: In some cases, investors may prefer traditional equity shares, which reduce the demand for ​equity shares with differential voting rights and impact their pricing.

Difference Between Ordinary Shares and DVR Shares

FeatureOrdinary SharesDVR Shares
Voting RightsEqual voting rights per shareVarying voting rights
DividendStandard dividendsHigher or varied dividends
PurposeGeneral ownership structureRetaining control or incentivising investors
Investor AppealBalanced focus on control and returnsGreater focus on returns with less control
ComplexitySimple structureMore complex due to variations

Differential Voting Rights for Startups

Startups in India are increasingly using differential voting rights (DVR) to raise funds without diluting control over their companies. SEBI’s regulatory changes in 2019 introduced a framework specifically designed to support startups by allowing them to issue shares with superior voting rights (SR equity shares) to founders.

These SR equity shares are granted only to promoters who are actively involved in the company’s management. They carry a maximum voting ratio of 10:1 compared to ordinary shares, ensuring founders maintain control even as they onboard new investors. However, these rights automatically lapse upon certain events, such as the promoter’s resignation or transfer of shares.

The framework benefits startups by addressing two critical challenges:

  1. Access to Capital Without Control Dilution: Startups often require significant funding for growth. Founders can raise the necessary capital by issuing DVR shares to external investors while preserving decision-making authority.
  2. Attracting Long-Term Investors: Investors focused on financial returns rather than governance involvement find DVR shares attractive due to their enhanced dividend payouts or discounted pricing.

Overall, DVR shares provide a balanced approach for startups to scale operations without compromising their core vision and control. SEBI’s provisions have made this mechanism more accessible and viable for early-stage companies aiming to achieve sustainable growth.

To Wrap It Up…

Differential voting rights have transformed corporate financing, offering a flexible mechanism to align capital requirements with control objectives. Companies and investors alike can leverage DVR shares to achieve their respective goals. However, transparency and compliance remain critical to maximising their potential.

Frequently Asked Questions About Differential Voting Rights

1. What is differential voting rights?

Differential voting rights refer to equity shares that provide unequal voting power or financial benefits compared to ordinary shares.

2. What is the difference between equity shares with voting and differential voting rights?

Ordinary equity shares provide equal voting rights, whereas ​​​equity shares with differential voting rights​ can either enhance or limit voting power, often accompanied by financial incentives.

3. Which companies have differential voting rights in India?

Tata Motors and Jain Irrigation are examples of companies that have issued DVR shares in India to balance control and capital requirements.

4. Can preference shares have differential voting rights?

No, preference shares typically focus on fixed returns rather than voting rights, making them distinct from DVR shares.

5. Do startups have differential voting rights in India?

Yes, startups can issue DVR shares to attract investment while retaining founder control, supported by SEBI’s regulatory framework.